Skip to main content
 
Notice: Users may be experiencing issues with displaying some pages on stanfordhealthcare.org. We are working closely with our technical teams to resolve the issue as quickly as possible. Thank you for your patience.
Stanford Health Care

A COMPARISON OF THERMOGRAPHY AND ELECTROMYOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY

A COMPARISON OF THERMOGRAPHY AND ELECTROMYOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY MUSCLE & NERVE So, Y. T., Olney, R. K., Aminoff, M. J. 1990; 13 (11): 1032-1036

Abstract

We studied 20 asymptomatic control subjects and 14 patients with clinically unequivocal cervical radiculopathy to compare the diagnostic value of thermography with that of electromyography. We measured the average skin temperature of designated regions over the neck, shoulder, and upper extremities. We then compared the temperature between corresponding regions of the two limbs, and between fingers innervated by different roots in the same hand. Thermography was abnormal in 6 patients (43%), whereas electromyography was abnormal in 10 (71%). Thermographic abnormalities were seen only in the hands and fingers, and the pattern did not follow the dermatome of the clinically involved cervical root. When compared to electromyography, thermography provided no additional diagnostic information. Thus, thermography does not have an established role in the evaluation of patients with cervical radiculopathy.

View details for Web of Science ID A1990ED87300005

View details for PubMedID 2172814