Abstract

To determine whether Zuidex using a non-cystoscopy mid-urethral injection technique produces as good a result (i.e. was not inferior) as Contigen injected endoscopically at the bladder neck in the treatment of urinary stress incontinence secondary to intrinsic sphincter deficiency in adult women.A prospective 2:1 randomized trial of mid-urethral injections of Zuidex-Implacer vs proximal urethral cystoscopic injections of Contigen was performed in 344 women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency at 23 North American sites, and followed up for >1 year from last treatment.Outcomes at 12 months from last treatment failed to demonstrate that mid-urethral injected Zuidex was equivalent to cystoscopically injected Contigen in primary and secondary outcome variables. The primary outcome, the proportion of women who achieved a 50% reduction in urinary leakage on provocation testing, was achieved in 84% of Contigen-treated women vs 65% of Zuidex-treated women.Confounding multiple variables inherent in the study design make a detailed analysis of study outcomes difficult.

View details for DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.034

View details for Web of Science ID 000270797900018

View details for PubMedID 19660800