Abstract

This study presents intermediate follow-up data on a randomized prospective series of patients undergoing either a modified laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh herniorrhaphy (IPOM) or conventional anterior inguinal herniorrhaphy (CH).All patients from two university affiliated hospitals with primary or recurrent inguinal hernias were recruited for randomization to either the IPOM technique utilizing a meshed expanded polytetrafluorethylene (ePTFE) soft tissue patch or CH. Follow-up data were gathered from postoperative clinic visits and telephone and mail surveys.Previously reported early recurrence and complication rates at a mean follow-up of 8 months were 1 of 30 (3%) and 5 of 30 (17%) for IPOM, and 2 of 28 (7%) and 5 of 28 (18%) for CH. Intermediate follow-up with 50 (23 IPOM and 27 CH) of the original 58 patients (86%) at a mean of 41 months reveals a recurrence rate of 10 of 23 (43%) for the IPOM group and 4 of 27 (15%) for the CH group (P = 0.053). Five delayed complications occurred in 4 IPOM patients (port site hernia 4, painful neuroma 1), while 2 delayed complications (unilateral testicular atrophy 2) occurred in 2 patients in the CH group. One IPOM versus 5 CH patients subsequently developed previously unrecognized contralateral hernias. There was 1 death unrelated to previous herniorrhaphy in each group.IPOM recurrence rates (43%) at a mean follow-up of 41 months are excessively high when compared with CH (15%) or with preliminary results of IPOM at 8 months of follow-up (3%). Despite reduced perioperative pain and disability and promising preliminary results in the IPOM group, these intermediate follow-up data strongly suggest that the IPOM technique should not be used for repair of inguinal hernias.

View details for Web of Science ID 000078160800033

View details for PubMedID 9926788