Learn about the flu shot, COVID-19 vaccine, and our masking policy »
New to MyHealth?
Manage Your Care From Anywhere.
Access your health information from any device with MyHealth. You can message your clinic, view lab results, schedule an appointment, and pay your bill.
ALREADY HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
DON'T HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
NEED MORE DETAILS?
MyHealth for Mobile
Get the iPhone MyHealth app »
Get the Android MyHealth app »
Abstract
We compared the presence of P. carinii in clinical specimens as detected by standard cytomorphologic techniques with amplification of P. carinii-specific DNA by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results correlated in 33 of 37 instances (89%): nine specimens were positive by both PCR and morphology; 24 specimens were negative by both techniques. Two specimens from one patient were obtained 3 days apart. The first specimen was both cytologically and PCR negative, while the second specimen was both cytologically and PCR positive for P. carinii. At least in some instances, therefore, PCR is no more sensitive than morphology, and other factors such as specimen adequacy are more important. Twelve of the 24 negative specimens were from patients with prior histories of P. carinii pneumonia, suggesting that recurrent disease may be from reacquisition of organisms in previously exposed individuals, rather than reactivation of latent organisms. Discrepant results included three morphologically negative specimens that were positive by PCR. It remains to be determined whether the increased sensitivity of PCR in these cases is real or artifactual. One morphologically positive specimen was negative by PCR. Polymerase chain reaction correlates well with cytomorphologic diagnosis of P. carinii pneumonia and may be a valuable diagnostic and epidemiologic tool.
View details for Web of Science ID A1992HJ85500003
View details for PubMedID 1374186