Learn about the flu shot, COVID-19 vaccine, and our masking policy »
New to MyHealth?
Manage Your Care From Anywhere.
Access your health information from any device with MyHealth. You can message your clinic, view lab results, schedule an appointment, and pay your bill.
ALREADY HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
DON'T HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
NEED MORE DETAILS?
MyHealth for Mobile
Get the iPhone MyHealth app »
Get the Android MyHealth app »
Abstract
This study compared the effectiveness of P300 event related potentials (ERPs) and reaction time (RT) in discriminating patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) from healthy control subjects. In particular, we examined how the use of more complex, ecologically relevant stimuli may affect the clinical utility of these tasks. We also evaluated how length of posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) and loss of consciousness (LOC) related to P300 and RT measures in our patient sample. There were 22 subjects (11 patients with TBI and 11 age-matched healthy control subjects). Four stimulus detection procedures were used: two using simple, conventional stimuli (auditory tone discrimination, AT; visual color discrimination, VC), and two using complex, ecologically relevant stimuli in the auditory and visual modalities (auditory word category discrimination, AWC; visual facial affect discrimination, VFA). Our results showed that RT measures were more effective in identifying TBI patients when complex stimuli were used (AWC and VFA). On the other hand, ERP measures were more effective in identifying TBI patients when simple stimuli were used (AT and VC). We also found a remarkably high correlation between duration of PTA and P300 amplitude.
View details for Web of Science ID 000250213400005
View details for PubMedID 17912064