Learn about the flu shot, COVID-19 vaccine, and our masking policy »
New to MyHealth?
Manage Your Care From Anywhere.
Access your health information from any device with MyHealth. You can message your clinic, view lab results, schedule an appointment, and pay your bill.
ALREADY HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
DON'T HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
NEED MORE DETAILS?
MyHealth for Mobile
Get the iPhone MyHealth app »
Get the Android MyHealth app »
Abstract
To determine if species differences exist in myocardial response to 1,4-dihydropyridine (DHP) calcium channel blockers, the binding and pharmacologic responses of a series of DHP compounds were examined in both rat and rabbit myocardium. [3H]Nitrendipine was used to label specific binding sites in myocardial membrane particulates. The results of saturation binding experiments (n = 3) indicated no statistically significant difference in either Kd or Bmax between rat and rabbit myocardial membranes (0.19 +/- 0.02 nM and 157 +/- 29 fmol/mg protein in rat and 0.14 +/- 0.06 nM and 227 +/- 125 fmol/mg protein in rabbit). Furthermore, [3H]nitrendipine binding inhibition experiments using 12 unlabeled DHP analogues yielded Ki values for each compound that were almost identical in myocardium from rat and rabbit, resulting in an excellent 1:1 correlation when data for all of the compounds were compared (r = 0.997, p less than 0.001). The negative inotropic effect of five of these DHP compounds was studied in vitro in isolated right papillary muscles from rabbit and right ventricular strips from rat, and concentration required to displace 50% of ligand binding (IC50) values for inhibition of contraction were determined. The IC50 values were significantly greater in rat myocardium than in rabbit myocardium (p less than 0.003). Therefore, a significantly lower potency of DHP calcium channel blockers has been demonstrated in rat compared with rabbit myocardium, and this species difference cannot be explained by a difference in the DHP binding site. Rat myocardium differs from rabbit myocardium in a number of ways that may explain this lower potency.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
View details for Web of Science ID A1988R055200005
View details for PubMedID 2467082