Extent, Location, and Clinical Significance ? of Non-Infarct-Related Coronary Artery Disease Among Patimts With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION Park, D., Clare, R. M., Schulte, P. J., Pieper, K. S., Shaw, L. K., Califf, R. M., Ohman, E. M., Van de Werf, F., Hirji, S., Harrington, R. A., Armstrong, P. W., Granger, C. B., Jeong, M., Patel, M. R. 2014; 312 (19): 2019-2027


Little information exists about the anatomical characteristics and clinical relevance of non-infarct-related artery (IRA) disease among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).To investigate the incidence, extent, and location of obstructive non-IRA disease and compare 30-day mortality according to the presence of non-IRA disease in patients with STEMI.Retrospective study of patients pooled from a convenience sample of 8 independent, international, randomized STEMI clinical trials published between 1993 and 2007. Follow-up varied from 1 month to 1 year. Among 68,765 patients enrolled in the trials, 28,282 patients with valid angiographic information were included in this analysis. Obstructive coronary artery disease was defined as stenosis of 50% or more of the diameter of a major epicardial artery. To assess the generalizability of trial-based results, external validation was performed using observational data for patients with STEMI from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) (between November 1, 2005, and December 31, 2013; n?=?18,217) and the Duke Cardiovascular Databank (between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2012; n?=?1812).Thirty-day mortality following STEMI.Overall, 52.8% (14,929 patients) had obstructive non-IRA disease; 29.6% involved 1 vessel and 18.8% involved 2 vessels. There was no substantial difference in the extent and distribution of non-IRA disease according to the IRA territory. Unadjusted and adjusted rates of 30-day mortality were significantly higher in patients with non-IRA disease than in those without non-IRA disease (unadjusted, 4.3% vs 1.7%, respectively; risk difference, 2.7% [95% CI, 2.3% to 3.0%], P?

View details for DOI 10.1001/jama.2014.15095

View details for Web of Science ID 000345450500016