Qualitative resting coronary pressure wave form analysis to predict fractional flow reserve EUROINTERVENTION Matsumura, M., Maehara, A., Johnson, N. P., Fearon, W. F., De Bruyne, B., Oldroyd, K. G., Pijls, N. J., Jenkins, P., Ali, Z. A., Mintz, G. S., Stone, G. W., Jeremias, A. 2019; 14 (15): E1601–E1608


The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictability of resting distal coronary pressure wave forms for fractional flow reserve (FFR).Resting coronary wave forms were qualitatively evaluated for the presence of (i) dicrotic notch, (ii) diastolic dipping, and (iii) ventricularisation. In a development cohort (n=88), a scoring system was developed that was then applied to a validation cohort (n=428) using a multivariable linear regression model to predict FFR and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) to predict FFR =0.8. In the development cohort, all three qualitative parameters were independent predictors of FFR. However, in a multivariable linear regression model in the validation cohort, qualitative wave form analysis did not further improve the ability of resting distal coronary to aortic pressure ratio (Pd/Pa) (p=0.80) or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) (p=0.26) to predict FFR. Using ROC, the area under the curve of resting Pd/Pa (0.86 versus 0.86, p=0.08) and iFR (0.86 versus 0.86, p=0.26) did not improve by adding qualitative analysis.Qualitative coronary wave form analysis showed moderate classification agreement in predicting FFR but did not add substantially to the resting pressure gradients Pd/Pa and iFR; however, when discrepancies between quantitative and qualitative analyses are observed, artefact or pressure drift should be considered.

View details for DOI 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01149

View details for Web of Science ID 000458030000014

View details for PubMedID 29581085