Skip to main content
 
Notice: Users may be experiencing issues with displaying some pages on stanfordhealthcare.org. We are working closely with our technical teams to resolve the issue as quickly as possible. Thank you for your patience.
Stanford Health Care

Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations in DMEK versus UT-DSAEK in DETECT: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations in DMEK versus UT-DSAEK in DETECT: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology Duggan, M. J., Rose-Nussbaumer, J., Lin, C. C., Austin, A., Labadzinzki, P. C., Chamberlain, W. D. 2019

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare corneal higher-order aberrations (HOA) following ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).DESIGN: Patient and outcome-masked, randomized controlled clinical trial.PARTICIPANTS: Patients with damaged or diseased endothelium from Fuchs endothelial dystrophy or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy who were considered good candidates for DMEK or UT-DSAEK.METHODS: Corneal anterior and posterior surface HOA were measured with Scheimpflug imaging before surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-operatively. Zernike orders 3-8 were calculated at 4.0- and 6.0-mm-diameter optical zones (OZ). HOA after UT-DSAEK and DMEK were compared and correlation was performed between best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and HOA at each time point.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Higher-order aberrations of the anterior and posterior cornea, expressed as the root mean square deviation from a best fit sphere reference surface.RESULTS: At 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, the posterior corneal surface had significantly less coma (P=0.003) and total HOA (P=0.001) in DMEK compared to UT-DSAEK (4.0- and 6.0-mm OZ). Posterior trefoil (P=0.034), secondary astigmatism (P=0.042), and tetrafoil (P=0.045) were lower in DMEK than UT-DSAEK at 3, 6, or 12 months (either 4.0- or 6.0-mm OZ). There were no significant differences in anterior surface HOA between DMEK and UT-DSAEK at any time point. Compared to baseline, total posterior HOA was significantly increased (P=0.036) in UT-DSAEK at 3, 6, and 12 months, in contrast to DMEK where it was significantly decreased (P=0.044) at 6 and 12 months (4.0- and/or 6.0-mm OZ). At 6 and 12 months, posterior corneal total HOA correlated moderately with BSCVA (rho=0.635, P=0.001) (4.0- and 6.0-mm OZ). There were no moderate or strong correlations between anterior or combined corneal surface HOA at any time point after surgery.CONCLUSIONS: DMEK results in less posterior corneal HOA compared to UT-DSAEK. DMEK decreases and UT-DSAEK increases posterior corneal HOA compared to pre-surgical values. Total posterior corneal HOA correlates moderately with 6- and 12-month post-operative visual acuity and may partially account for the better visual acuity observed after DMEK.

View details for PubMedID 30776384