Tissue oxygenation response to mild hypercapnia during cardiopulmonary bypass with constant pump output BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA Akca, O., Sessler, D. I., Delong, D., Keijner, R., Ganzel, B., Doufas, A. G. 2006; 96 (6): 708-714

Abstract

Tissue oxygenation is the primary determinant of wound infection risk. Mild hypercapnia markedly improves cutaneous, subcutaneous (s.c.), and muscular tissue oxygenation in volunteers and patients. However, relative contributions of increased cardiac output and peripheral vasodilation to this response remains unknown. We thus tested the hypothesis that increased cardiac output is the dominant mechanism.We recruited 10 ASA III patients, aged 40-65 yr, undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass for this crossover trial. After induction of anaesthesia, a Silastic tonometer was inserted s.c. in the upper arm. S.C. tissue oxygen tension was measured with both polarographic electrode and fluorescence-based systems. Oximeter probes were placed bilaterally on the forehead to monitor cerebral oxygenation. After initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass, in random order patients were exposed to two arterial CO(2) partial pressures for 30 min each: 35 (normocapnia) or 50 mm Hg (hypercapnia). Bypass pump flow was kept constant throughout the measurement periods.Hypercapnia during bypass had essentially no effect on Pa(CO(2)) , mean arterial pressure, or tissue temperature. Pa(CO(2)) and pH differed significantly. S.C. tissue oxygenation was virtually identical during the two Pa(CO(2)) periods [139 (50-163) vs 145 (38-158), P=0.335] [median (range)]. In contrast, cerebral oxygen saturation (our positive control measurement) was significantly less during normocapnia [57 (28-67)%] than hypercapnia [64 (37-89)%, P=0.025].Mild hypercapnia, which normally markedly increases tissue oxygenation, did not do so during cardiopulmonary bypass with fixed pump output. This suggests that hypercapnia normally increases tissue oxygenation by increasing cardiac output rather than direct dilation of peripheral vessels.

View details for DOI 10.1093/bja/ael093

View details for Web of Science ID 000237696400006

View details for PubMedID 16675511