Skip to main content
 
Notice: Users may be experiencing issues with displaying some pages on stanfordhealthcare.org. We are working closely with our technical teams to resolve the issue as quickly as possible. Thank you for your patience.
Stanford Health Care

Assessing the Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary High-Risk Truncal/Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas: An Analysis of the Multi-institutional U.S. Sarcoma Collaborative.

Assessing the Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary High-Risk Truncal/Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas: An Analysis of the Multi-institutional U.S. Sarcoma Collaborative. Annals of surgical oncology Zaidi, M. Y., Ethun, C. G., Tran, T. B., Poultsides, G., Grignol, V. P., Howard, J. H., Bedi, M., Mogal, H., Tseng, J., Roggin, K. K., Chouliaras, K., Votanopoulos, K., Krasnick, B., Fields, R. C., Oskouei, S., Reimer, N., Monson, D., Maithel, S. K., Cardona, K. 2019

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for high-risk soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is questioned. This study aimed to define which patients may experience a survival advantage with NCT.METHODS: All the patients from the U.S. Sarcoma Collaborative database (2000-2016) who underwent curative-intent resection of high-grade, primary truncal/extremity STS size 5cm or larger were included in this study. The primary end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).RESULTS: Of the 4153 patients, 770 were included in the study. The median tumor size was 10cm, and 669 of the patients (87%) had extremity tumors. The most common histology was undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), found in 42% of the patients. Of the 770 patients, 216 (28%) received NCT. The patients who received NCT had deeper, larger tumors (p<0.001). Of the patients with tumors 5cm or larger and 8cm or larger, NCT was not associated with improved RFS or OS. However for the patients with tumors 10cm or larger, NCT was associated with improved 5-year RFS (51% vs 40%; p=0.053) and 5-year OS (58% vs 47%; p=0.043). By location, the patients with extremity tumors 10cm or larger but not truncal tumors had improved 5-yearr RFS (54% vs 42%; p=0.042) and 5-year OS (61% vs 47%; p=0.015) with NCT. According to histology, no subtype had improved RFS or OS with NCT, although the patients with UPS had a trend toward improved 5-year RFS (56% vs 42%; p=0.092) and 5-year OS (66% vs 52%; p=0.103) with NCT.CONCLUSION: For the patients with high-grade STS, NCT was associated with improved RFS and OS when tumors were 10cm or larger and located in the extremity. However, no histiotype-specific advantage was identified. Future studies assessing the efficacy of NCT may consider focusing on these patients, with added focus on histology-specific strategies.

View details for DOI 10.1245/s10434-019-07639-7

View details for PubMedID 31342400