Learn about the flu shot, COVID-19 vaccine, and our masking policy »
New to MyHealth?
Manage Your Care From Anywhere.
Access your health information from any device with MyHealth. You can message your clinic, view lab results, schedule an appointment, and pay your bill.
ALREADY HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
DON'T HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
NEED MORE DETAILS?
MyHealth for Mobile
Get the iPhone MyHealth app »
Get the Android MyHealth app »
Abstract
Transporting intubated patients is common among ground and air crews, and providing adequate oxygenation/ventilation through transport ventilators (TV) or manual ventilation (MV) is clinically challenging. However, very little data chronicle service or practice patterns of oxygenation/ventilation within the industry.During February 1998, a national sample of 250 air transport agencies was surveyed regarding activities and services surrounding this population of transported patients. One-hundred-ninety-three surveys (77%) were returned.Approximately 40% of responding agencies use rotor-wing transportation only. Various combinations of rotor-, fixed-wing, and critical care ground transport were reported among the sample. Crew configuration consisted primarily of RN/EMT-P (75%). For pre-hospital intubated patients, MV alone (37.3%), TV alone (10.9%), or a combination of MV and TV (43.5%) was used, depending on transport circumstances. Programs not involved in pre-hospital transports accounted for 8.3% of returned surveys. Interfacility transports used MV (6.8%), TV (39.4%), and a combination (53.4%). One respondent did not answer the question, accounting for 0.4% of the returned surveys. More than 75% of programs monitored oxygenation/ventilation during transport. Usually some combination of pulse oximetry and CO2 monitoring was used. More than half (59%) of reporting agencies transport more than 80 intubated adults each year.Considerable variation exists in practices involving the transport of intubated patients.
View details for PubMedID 11010378