Notice: Users may be experiencing issues with displaying some pages on stanfordhealthcare.org. We are working closely with our technical teams to resolve the issue as quickly as possible. Thank you for your patience.
 

Learn about the flu shot, COVID-19 vaccine, and our masking policy »

Stanford Health Care

SBRT Treatment Planning Study for the First Clinical Biology-Guided Radiotherapy System. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Pham, D., Breitkreutz, D., Simiele, E., Capaldi, D. P., Ngo, N., Vitzthum, L., Gensheimer, M. F., Chin, A. L., Han, B., Surucu, M., Xing, L., Chang, D. T., Kovalchuk, N. 2021; 111 (3S): e548-e549

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): The first clinical biology-guided radiation therapy (BgRT) system - RefleXion X1 - is installed and is being commissioned for clinical use at our institution. The system delivers 6MV-FFF beam via 50 firing positions at 850 cGy/min dose rate on 60 rpm rotating gantry with the couch advancing in 2.1 mm increments. Collimation is achieved through a binary multi-leaf collimator system composed of 64 (6.25 mm width at 850 cm SAD) leaves and 10mm or 20mm jaws. The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment plan quality and delivery efficiency for SBRT cases without PET-guidance.MATERIALS/METHODS: Five lung cancer patients (50 Gy/4fx) with motion-inclusive PTV previously treated with VMAT SBRT were selected for this retrospective study. For each VMAT plan a corresponding plan was generated on the RefleXion treatment planning system (TPS) using our institutional planning constraints. VMAT SBRT plans used 1-2 partial arcs with 10MV-FFF energy and 2400 MU/min dose rate. RefleXion SBRT plans used all 50 firing positions and 1 cm jaw collimation. As plan normalization option does not yet exist in the RefleXion TPS, the plans were optimized to achieve PTV D95% coverage with 100% of prescription dose to the best of planner's ability. All clinically relevant metrics in this study, including plan PTV D95%, PTV D1%, 50% isodose volume (I50%), Conformity Index (CI), organs at risk constraints, and treatment time were analyzed and compared between VMAT and RefleXion plans using paired t-tests.RESULTS: Clinically acceptable plans were obtained with both techniques. The average PTV volume was 14.1 ± 6.4cc. For VMAT and RefleXion plans, no statistically significant difference was observed in PTV D95%, PTV D1%, CI or I50%. Ipsilateral lung volume spared at 12.4 Gy (VS12.4) was slightly greater (31.6cc increase, P < 0.035) and skin Dmax was slightly lower (1.4 Gy decrease, P < 0.038) for RefleXion plans. Treatment beam-on time was significantly longer for RefleXion plans (23.4min increase, P < 0.0002).CONCLUSION: RefleXion TPS provided comparable plan quality to lung SBRT VMAT plans. Treatment beam-on time is significantly longer for the RefleXion system.

View details for DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1490

View details for PubMedID 34701721