New to MyHealth?
Manage Your Care From Anywhere.
Access your health information from any device with MyHealth. You can message your clinic, view lab results, schedule an appointment, and pay your bill.
ALREADY HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
DON'T HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
NEED MORE DETAILS?
MyHealth for Mobile
Characteristics and Treatment Rate of Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the Direct-Acting Antiviral Era and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States.
Characteristics and Treatment Rate of Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the Direct-Acting Antiviral Era and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States. JAMA network open Nguyen, V. H., Kam, L., Yeo, Y. H., Huang, D. Q., Henry, L., Cheung, R., Nguyen, M. H. 2022; 5 (12): e2245424Abstract
Clinical data on hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment rates in the United States are sparse.To evaluate HCV treatment rates in the era of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs).This retrospective cohort study used data from the deidentified Optum Cliniformatics Data Mart Database (2014-2021) on patients with HCV in the DAA and COVID-19 eras. The database includes patients with private health insurance in the US.The treatment rate and changes over time were assessed with adjusted log-binomial regression, and factors associated with treatment were examined using multivariable logistic regression.A total of 133?348 patients with HCV (79?567 [59.7%] men; mean [SD] age, 59.7 [12.3] years; 4448 [3.3%] Asian, 24?662 [18.5%] Black, and 74?750 [56.1%] White individuals) were included; 38?180 (26.8%) had HCV RNA data, and of those, 20?277 (53.1%) had positive HCV RNA. Overall, 13?214 patients with positive HCV RNA tests (65.2%) received DAA treatment; 6456 of 6634 patients treated with DAAs (97.3%) achieved sustained virologic response. After adjusting for age, sex, and race and ethnicity, the treatment rate in 2018 was 0.5 times greater than the rate in 2014 (adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.42-1.59) but declined after 2018, decreasing from 64.8% to 61.2%, and especially after 2019, when it decreased to less than 60% (P?
View details for DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.45424
View details for PubMedID 36477481