An updated analysis of retransplantation following living donor liver transplantation in the US: insights from the latest UNOS database.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no recent update on the clinical course of retransplantation(re-LT) after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the US using recent national data.METHOD: The UNOS database (2002-2023) was used to explore patient characteristics in initial LT, comparing deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) and LDLT for graft survival (GS), reasons for graft failure, and GS after re-LT. It assesses waitlist dropout and re-LT likelihood, categorizing re-LT cohort based on time to re-listing as acute or chronic (= or >1mo).RESULTS: Of 132,323 DDLT and 5,955 LDLT initial transplants, 3,848 DDLT and 302 LDLT recipients underwent re-LT. Of the 302 re-LT following LDLT, 156 were acute and 146 chronic. Primary non-function (PNF) was more common in DDLT, although the difference was not statistically significant (17.4%vs14.8% for LDLT; p=0.52). Vascular complications were significantly higher in LDLT (12.5%vs8.3% for DDLT; p<0.01). Acute re-LT showed a larger difference in PNF between DDLT and LDLT (49.7%vs32.0%; p<0.01). Status 1 patients were more common in DDLT (51.3%vs34.0% in LDLT; p<0.01). In the acute cohort, Kaplan-Meier curves indicated superior GS post-re-LT for initial LDLT recipients in both short-term and long-term (p=0.02 and <0.01, respectively), with no significant difference in the chronic cohort. No significant differences in waitlist dropout were observed, but the initial LDLT group had a higher re-LT likelihood in the acute cohort (sHR 1.40, p<0.01). A sensitivity analysis focusing on the most recent 10-year cohort revealed trends consistent with the overall study findings.CONCLUSION: LDLT recipients had better GS in re-LT than DDLT. Despite a higher severity of illness, the DDLT cohort was less likely to undergo re-LT.

View details for DOI 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000393

View details for PubMedID 38727618