Skip to main content
 
Notice: Users may be experiencing issues with displaying some pages on stanfordhealthcare.org. We are working closely with our technical teams to resolve the issue as quickly as possible. Thank you for your patience.
Stanford Health Care

Multicenter, multivendor validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping in patients with iron overload at 1.5T and 3T.

Multicenter, multivendor validation of liver quantitative susceptibility mapping in patients with iron overload at 1.5T and 3T. Magnetic resonance in medicine Buelo, C. J., Velikina, J., Mao, L., Zhao, R., Yuan, Q., Ghasabeh, M. A., Ruschke, S., Karampinos, D. C., Harris, D. T., Mattison, R. J., Jeng, M. R., Pedrosa, I., Kamel, I. R., Vasanawala, S., Yokoo, T., Reeder, S. B., Hernando, D. 2024

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of QSM of the liver via single breath-hold chemical shift-encoded MRI at both 1.5T and 3T in a multicenter, multivendor study in subjects with iron overload.METHODS: This prospective study included four academic medical centers with three different MRI vendors at 1.5T and 3T. Subjects with known or suspected liver iron overload underwent multi-echo spoiled gradient-recalled-echo scans at each field strength. A subset received repeatability testing at either 1.5T or 3T. Susceptibility and R 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ maps were reconstructed from the multi-echo images and analyzed at a single center. QSM-measured susceptibility was compared with R 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ and a commercial R2-based liver iron concentration method across centers and field strengths using linear regression and F-tests on the intercept and slope. Field-strength reproducibility and test/retest repeatability were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis.RESULTS: A total of 155/80 data sets (test/retest) were available at 1.5T, and 159/70 data sets (test/retest) were available at 3T. Calibrations across sites were reproducible, with some variability (e.g., susceptibility slope with liver iron concentration ranged from 0.102 to 0.123g/[mg · $$ \cdotp $$ ppm] across centers at 1.5T). Field strength reproducibility was good (concordance correlation coefficient=0.862), and test/retest repeatability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.951).CONCLUSION: QSM as an imaging biomarker of liver iron overload is feasible and repeatable across centers and MR vendors. It may be complementary with R 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ as they are obtained from the same acquisition. Although good reproducibility was observed, liver QSM may benefit from standardization of acquisition parameters. Overall, QSM is a promising method for liver iron quantification.

View details for DOI 10.1002/mrm.30251

View details for PubMedID 39238238