Skip to main content
 
Notice: Users may be experiencing issues with displaying some pages on stanfordhealthcare.org. We are working closely with our technical teams to resolve the issue as quickly as possible. Thank you for your patience.
 

See our updated masking policy

Stanford Health Care

The effect of prophylactic antibiotics on second-stage breast reconstruction: A retrospective analysis.

The effect of prophylactic antibiotics on second-stage breast reconstruction: A retrospective analysis. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS Barrera, J., Lakhlani, D., Francis, S., Maheta, B., Gonzalez, C., Nino, G., Choi, H., Buckman, C., Baah, C. A., Johnstone, T., Yesantharao, P., Goli, R., Thawanyarat, K., Sivaraj, D., Nazerali, R. 2025; 102: 176-184

Abstract

Implant-based breast reconstruction has a higher infection risk than cosmetic augmentation, leading to routine prophylactic antibiotic use. We previously found extended prophylaxis reduced infections during the first-stage reconstruction with tissue expander/acellular dermal matrix placement. However, the most appropriate antibiotic class and duration of prophylaxis in the second-stage reconstruction remains unclear. This retrospective study aims to address this gap, focusing on antibiotic selection and duration during second-stage implant-based breast reconstruction.A single-center retrospective cohort study involved 359 patients undergoing second-stage breast reconstruction with tissue expander-implant exchange between January 2018 and January 2021. Chart reviews were performed to collect patient and surgical factors, antibiotic prophylaxis information, and postoperative outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression and likelihood ratio tests assessed associations between prophylaxis, covariates, and complications.Beyond a single perioperative dose of cefazolin, extended antibiotic prophylaxis did not significantly affect postoperative infection likelihood after second-stage breast reconstruction. Patients were grouped by antibiotic prophylaxis duration: 0 days (62 patients), 1 to 6 days (58 patients), and 7 or more days (239 patients). Extending antibiotic prophylaxis duration did not improve the prediction of 3-month postoperative infection rate (p = 0.581). A previous history of breast infection was a significant predictor for infection (p < 0.001).Extending antibiotics prophylaxis beyond a single preoperative dose of intravenous cefazolin does not reduce complication rates for patients undergoing second-stage breast reconstruction. Limiting prolonged prophylactic antibiotic use beyond the anesthetic period may reduce side effects (e.g., upset GI tract) and associated complications, including allergic reactions, Clostridium difficile colitis, and the emergence of new antibiotic-resistant pathogens.

View details for DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.01.032

View details for PubMedID 39933364