New to MyHealth?
Manage Your Care From Anywhere.
Access your health information from any device with MyHealth. You can message your clinic, view lab results, schedule an appointment, and pay your bill.
ALREADY HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
DON'T HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
NEED MORE DETAILS?
MyHealth for Mobile
An Automated Algorithm for Classifying Expansive Responses for Gender Identity.
An Automated Algorithm for Classifying Expansive Responses for Gender Identity. Psychology of sexual orientation and gender diversity Ceja, A., Raygani, S., Conner, B. T., Lisha, N. E., Bryant-Lees, K. B., Lubensky, M. E., Lunn, M. R., Obedin-Maliver, J., Flentje, A. 2024Abstract
Current two-step measures of gender identity do not prescribe methods for using expanded responses (e.g., multiple selections) among sexual and gender minority (SGM) people, though they want the opportunity to provide these responses. To increase statistical power using expanded gender identity responses, we created an automated algorithm to generate analyzable categories. Participants' expanded gender identity responses and sex assigned at birth were used to create five categories (i.e., cisgender men, cisgender women, gender expansive individuals, transgender men, and transgender women) from a cohort of SGM people (N = 6,312, 53% cisgender individuals). Data was collected from June 2020 to June 2021. Chi-square tests were performed to assess the association between the algorithm-generated and participant-selected gender categories, and to identify demographic differences between participants in the algorithm-generated categories. Forty-six percent of our sample may have been classified into an "other" category without an algorithm due to writing their own response (5.7%), selecting "another gender identity" (5.7%), or selecting multiple (42.6%) or less commonly described (10.2%) gender identities. There was a relationship between the categories formed by our algorithm and participants' single category selection (?2 [20] = 19,000, p < .001). Concordance rates were high (97-99%) among all groups except for participants classified as gender expansive (74.3%). Without an algorithm to incorporate expanded gender identity responses, almost half of the sample may have been classified into an "other" category or dropped from analyses. Our algorithm successfully classified participants into analyzable categories from expanded gender responses.
View details for DOI 10.1037/sgd0000762
View details for PubMedID 41267672
View details for PubMedCentralID PMC12629618