Patient-Centered Decision Making in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis LARYNGOSCOPE Soler, Z. M., Rudmik, L., Hwang, P. H., Mace, J. C., Schlosser, R. J., Smith, T. L. 2013; 123 (10): 2341-2346


To explore possible factors that might impact a patient's choice to pursue endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) or continue with medical management for treatment of refractory chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).Cross-sectional evaluation of a multicenter prospective cohort.Two hundred forty-two subjects with CRS were prospectively enrolled within four academic tertiary care centers across North America with ongoing symptoms despite prior medical treatment. Subjects either self-selected continued medical management (n?=?62) or ESS (n?=?180) for treatment of sinonasal symptoms. Differences in demographics, comorbid conditions, and clinical measures of disease severity between subject groups were compared. Validated metrics of social support, personality, risk aversion, and physician-patient relationships were compared using bivariate analyses, predicted probabilities, and receiver operating characteristic curves at the 0.05 alpha level.No significant differences were found between treatment groups for any demographic characteristic, clinical cofactor, or measure of social support, personality, or the physician-patient relationship. Subjects electing to pursue sinus surgery did report significantly worse average quality-of-life (QOL) scores on the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22; P?

View details for DOI 10.1002/lary.24027

View details for Web of Science ID 000325091100005

View details for PubMedID 23856802