Multicenter Closed-Loop/Hybrid Meal Bolus Insulin Delivery with Type 1 Diabetes DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS Chase, H. P., Doyle, F. J., Zisser, H., Renard, E., Nimri, R., Cobelli, C., Buckingham, B. A., Maahs, D. M., Anderson, S., Magni, L., Lum, J., Calhoun, P., Kollman, C., Beck, R. W. 2014; 16 (10): 623-632

Abstract

This study evaluated meal bolus insulin delivery strategies and associated postprandial glucose control while using an artificial pancreas (AP) system.This study was a multicenter trial in 53 patients, 12-65 years of age, with type 1 diabetes for at least 1 year and use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for at least 6 months. Four different insulin bolus strategies were assessed: standard bolus delivered with meal (n=51), standard bolus delivered 15 min prior to meal (n=40), over-bolus of 30% delivered with meal (n=40), and bolus purposely omitted (n=46). Meal carbohydrate (CHO) intake was 1 g of CHO/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 100 g for the first three strategies or up to a maximum of 50 g for strategy 4.Only three of 177 meals (two with over-bolus and one with standard bolus 15 min prior to meal) had postprandial blood glucose values of <60 mg/dL. Postprandial hyperglycemia (blood glucose level >180 mg/dL) was prolonged for all four bolus strategies but was shorter for the over-bolus (41% of the 4-h period) than the two standard bolus strategies (73% for each). Mean postprandial blood glucose level was 15.9 mg/dL higher for the standard bolus with meal compared with the prebolus (baseline-adjusted, P=0.07 for treatment effect over the 4-h period).The AP handled the four bolus situations safely, but at the expense of having elevated postprandial glucose levels in most subjects. This was most likely secondary to suboptimal performance of the algorithm.

View details for DOI 10.1089/dia.2014.0050

View details for Web of Science ID 000342561100003

View details for PubMedID 25188375

View details for PubMedCentralID PMC4183919