Skip to main content
 
Notice: Users may be experiencing issues with displaying some pages on stanfordhealthcare.org. We are working closely with our technical teams to resolve the issue as quickly as possible. Thank you for your patience.
 

See our updated masking policy »

Stanford Health Care

Association of Borderline Pulmonary Hypertension With Mortality and Hospitalization in a Large Patient Cohort: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program CIRCULATION Maron, B. A., Hess, E., Maddox, T. M., Opotowsky, A. R., Tedford, R. J., Lahm, T., Joynt, K. E., Kass, D. J., Stephens, T., Stanislawski, M. A., Swenson, E. R., Goldstein, R. H., Leopold, J. A., Zamanian, R. T., Elwing, J. M., Plomondon, M. E., Grunwald, G. K., Baron, A. E., Rumsfeld, J. S., Choudhary, G. 2016; 133 (13): 1240-1248

Abstract

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with increased morbidity across the cardiopulmonary disease spectrum. Based primarily on expert consensus opinion, PH is defined by a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) =25 mm?Hg. Although mPAP levels below this threshold are common among populations at risk for PH, the relevance of mPAP <25 mm?Hg to clinical outcome is unknown.We analyzed retrospectively all US veterans undergoing right heart catheterization (2007-2012) in the Veterans Affairs healthcare system (n=21?727; 908-day median follow-up). Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between mPAP and outcomes of all-cause mortality and hospitalization, adjusted for clinical covariates. When treating mPAP as a continuous variable, the mortality hazard increased beginning at 19 mm?Hg (hazard ratio [HR]=1.183; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.004-1.393) relative to 10 mm?Hg. Therefore, patients were stratified into 3 groups: (1) referent (=18 mm?Hg; n=4?207); (2) borderline PH (19-24 mm?Hg; n=5?030); and (3) PH (=25 mm?Hg; n=12?490). The adjusted mortality hazard was increased for borderline PH (HR=1.23; 95% CI, 1.12-1.36; P<0.0001) and PH (HR=2.16; 95% CI, 1.96-2.38; P<0.0001) compared with the referent group. The adjusted hazard for hospitalization was also increased in borderline PH (HR=1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12; P=0.0149) and PH (HR=1.15; 95% CI, 1.09-1.22; P<0.0001). The borderline PH cohort remained at increased risk for mortality after excluding the following high-risk subgroups: (1) patients with pulmonary artery wedge pressure >15 mm?Hg; (2) pulmonary vascular resistance =3.0 Wood units; or (3) inpatient status at the time of right heart catheterization.These data illustrate a continuum of risk according to mPAP level and that borderline PH is associated with increased mortality and hospitalization. Future investigations are needed to test the generalizability of our findings to other populations and study the effect of treatment on outcome in borderline PH.

View details for DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020207

View details for PubMedID 26873944