New to MyHealth?
Manage Your Care From Anywhere.
Access your health information from any device with MyHealth. You can message your clinic, view lab results, schedule an appointment, and pay your bill.
ALREADY HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
DON'T HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
NEED MORE DETAILS?
MyHealth for Mobile
Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls
Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER PHYSIOLOGY Ghosh, S. K., Pandolfino, J. E., Rice, J., Clarke, J. O., Kwiatek, M., Kahrilas, P. J. 2007; 293 (4): G878–G885Abstract
Assessing deglutitive esophagogastric junction (EGJ) relaxation is an essential focus of clinical manometry. Our aim was to apply automated algorithmic analyses to high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies to ascertain the optimal method for discriminating normal from abnormal deglutitive EGJ relaxation. All 473 subjects (73 controls) were studied with a 36-channel solid-state HRM assembly during water swallows. Patients were classified as: 1) achalasia, 2) postfundoplication, 3) nonachalasia with normal deglutitive EGJ relaxation, or 4) functional obstruction (preserved peristalsis with incomplete EGJ relaxation). Automated computer programs assessed the adequacy of EGJ relaxation by using progressively complex analysis routines to compensate for esophageal shortening, crural diaphragm contraction, and catheter movement, all potential confounders. The single-sensor method of assessing EGJ relaxation had a sensitivity of only 52% for detecting achalasia. Of the automated HRM analysis paradigms tested, the 4-s integrated relaxation pressure using a cutoff of 15 mmHg performed optimally with 98% sensitivity and 96% specificity in the detection of achalasia. We also identified a heterogeneous group of 26 patients with functional EGJ obstruction attributed to variant achalasia and other diverse pathology. Although further clinical experience will ultimately judge, it is our expectation that applying rigorous methodology such as described herein to the analysis of HRM studies will improve the consistency in the interpretation of clinical manometry and prove useful in guiding clinical management.
View details for DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.00252.2007
View details for Web of Science ID 000249995200027
View details for PubMedID 17690172