Skip to main content
 
Notice: Users may be experiencing issues with displaying some pages on stanfordhealthcare.org. We are working closely with our technical teams to resolve the issue as quickly as possible. Thank you for your patience.
 

See our updated masking policy »

Stanford Health Care

Anatomic Dissection and CT Imaging of the Anterior Cruciate and Medial Collateral Ligament Footprint Anatomy in Skeletally Immature Cadaver Knees. Journal of pediatric orthopedics Shea, K. G., Cannamela, P. C., Dingel, A. B., Fabricant, P. D., Polousky, J. D., Anderson, A. F., Ganley, T. J. 2019

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries in skeletally immature patients are increasingly recognized and surgically treated. However, the relationship between the footprint anatomy and the physes are not clearly defined. The purpose of this study was to identify the origin and insertion of the ACL and MCL, and define the footprint anatomy in relation to the physes in skeletally immature knees.Twenty-nine skeletally immature knees from 16 human cadaver specimens were dissected and divided into 2 groups: group A (aged 2 to 5?y), and group B (aged 7 to 11?y). Metallic markers were placed to mark the femoral and tibial attachments of the ACL and MCL. Computed tomography scans were obtained for each specimen used to measure the distance from the center of the ligament footprints to the respective distal femoral and proximal tibial physes.The median distance from the ACL femoral epiphyseal origin to the distal femoral physis was 0.30?cm (interquartile range, 0.20 to 0.50?cm) and 0.70?cm (interquartile range, 0.45 to 0.90?cm) for groups A and B, respectively. The median distance from the ACL epiphyseal tibial insertion to the proximal tibial physis for groups A and B were 1.50?cm (interquartile range, 1.40 to 1.60?cm) and 1.80?cm (interquartile range, 1.60 to 1.85?cm), respectively. The median distance from the MCL femoral origin on the epiphysis to the distal femoral physis was 1.20?cm (interquartile range, 1.00 to 1.20?cm) and 0.85?cm (interquartile range, 0.63 to 1.00?cm) for groups A and B, respectively. The median distance from the MCL insertion on the tibial metaphysis to the tibial physis was 3.05?cm (interquartile range, 2.63 to 3.30?cm) and 4.80?cm (interquartile range, 3.90 to 5.10?cm) for groups A and B, respectively.Surgical reconstruction is a common treatment for ACL injury. Computed tomography scanning of pediatric tissue clearly defines the location of the ACL and MCL with respect to the femoral and tibial physes, and may guide surgeons for physeal respecting procedures.In addition to ACL reconstruction, recent basic science and clinical research suggest that ACL repair may be more commonly performed in the future. MCL repair and reconstruction is also occasionally required in skeletally immature patients. This information may be useful to help surgeons avoid or minimize physeal injury during ACL/MCL reconstructions and/or repair in skeletally immature patients.

View details for DOI 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001398

View details for PubMedID 31166245