Notice: Users may be experiencing issues with displaying some pages on stanfordhealthcare.org. We are working closely with our technical teams to resolve the issue as quickly as possible. Thank you for your patience.
 

Learn about the flu shot, COVID-19 vaccine, and our masking policy »

Stanford Health Care

Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for the detection of neovascular age-related macular degeneration from color fundus photographs. Clinical & experimental ophthalmology Keel, S., Li, Z., Scheetz, J., Robman, L., Phung, J., Makeyeva, G., Aung, K. Z., Liu, C., Yan, X., Meng, W., Guymer, R., Chang, R., He, M. 2019

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Detection of early onset neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is critical to protecting vision.BACKGROUND: To describe the development and validation of a deep learning algorithm (DLA) for the detection of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.DESIGN: Development and validation of a DLA using retrospective datasets.PARTICIPANTS: We developed and trained the DLA using 56,113 retinal images and an additional 86,162 images from an independent dataset to externally validate the DLA. All images were non-stereoscopic and retrospectively collected.METHODS: The internal validation dataset was derived from real-world clinical settings in China. Gold standard grading was assigned when consensus was reached by 3 individual ophthalmologists. The DLA classified 31,247 images as gradable and 24,866 as ungradable (poor quality or poor field definition). These ungradable images were used to create a classification model for image quality. Efficiency and diagnostic accuracy were tested using 86,162 images derived from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. Neovascular AMD and/or ungradable outcome in one or both eyes was considered referable.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity.RESULTS: In the internal validation dataset, the AUC, sensitivity and specificity of the DLA for neovascular AMD was 0.995, 96.7%, 96.4%, respectively. Testing against the independent external dataset achieved an AUC, sensitivity and specificity of 0.967, 100% and 93.4%, respectively. More than 60% of false positive cases displayed other macular pathologies. Among the false negative cases (internal validation dataset only), over half (57.2%) proved to be undetected detachment of the neurosensory retina or RPE layer.CONCLUSIONS: This DLA shows robust performance for the detection of neovascular AMD amongst retinal images from a multi-ethnic sample and under different imaging protocols. Further research is warranted to investigate where this technology could be best utilized within screening and research settings. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

View details for DOI 10.1111/ceo.13575

View details for PubMedID 31215760