Abstract

Microfracture is a commonly utilized cartilage restoration technique for articular cartilage defects. While the removal of the calcified cartilage layer (CCL) has been shown to be critical with in vivo models, little is known with regard to surgeon reliability to adequately perform the technique.To evaluate surgeon reliability in removing the CCL utilizing open and arthroscopic techniques.Controlled laboratory study.Eleven cadaveric knees were utilized to create four 12-mm diameter defects in the anterior and posterior medial femoral condyles. Eleven fellowship-trained surgeons were asked to perform the following procedures: remove the CCL open, retain the CCL open, remove the CCL arthroscopically, and retain the CCL arthroscopically. Samples underwent histologic staining and analysis with 3-dimensional micro-computed tomography. The latter was used to calculate the percentage of the CCL that was removed or retained across the entire defect.When surgeons were asked to retain the CCL arthroscopically, 48% ± 41% (mean ± SD) remained. When surgeons were asked to remove the CCL arthroscopically, 24% ± 35% remained. There was no statistical difference between these groups (P > .05). When the CCL was retained during open preparation, 60% ± 39% remained. During attempts to remove the CCL in an open manner, 19% ± 28% remained. There was a significant difference in the amount of CCL remaining between the open removal and open retaining groups (P = .03). There were no significant differences in the percentage of CCL remaining between the open and arthroscopic preservation groups and between the open and arthroscopic removal groups.This study highlights the significant variability in surgeon ability to reliably retain or remove the CCL. However, there appears to be improved ability of surgeons to more reliably remove or retain the CCL in an open fashion as compared with the arthroscopic approach.

View details for DOI 10.1177/0363546519859851

View details for PubMedID 31336053