Impact of Minimal Residual Negativity using Next Generation Flow Cytometry on Outcomes in Light Chain Amyloidosis. American journal of hematology Sidana, S., Muchtar, E., Sidiqi, M. H., Jevremovic, D., Dispenzieri, A., Gonsalves, W., Buadi, F., Lacy, M. Q., Hayman, S. R., Kourelis, T., Kapoor, P., Go, R. S., Warsame, R., Leung, N., Rajkumar, S. V., Kyle, R. A., Gertz, M. A., Kumar, S. K. 2020

Abstract

We evaluated bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in 44 patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis using next generation flow cytometry (sensitivity > 1x 10-5 ; median events analyzed: 8.7 million, range: 4.8 to 9.7 million). All patients underwent MRD testing in two years from start of therapy (median: 7 months). Overall MRD negative rate was 64% (n=28). MRD-negative rate after one-line of therapy was 71% (20/28). MRD negative rates were higher with stem-cell transplant as first-line therapy (86%, 18/21) vs. chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment (29%, 2/7), p=0.005. MRD negative rate amongst patients in complete response were 75% (15/20); in very good partial response: 50% (11/22) and there were two patients in partial response/rising light chains (with renal dysfunction) who were MRD negative. There were no differences in baseline characteristics of MRD negative vs. MRD positive patients, except younger age among MRD-negative patients. MRD negative patients were more likely to have achieved cardiac response at the time of MRD assessment, 67% (8/12) vs. 22% (2/7), p=0.04. Renal response rates were similar in both groups. Progression free survival was assessed in the 42 patients achieving CR or VGPR. After median follow-up of 14 months, the estimated 1-year progression free survival in MRD negative vs. MRD positive patients was 100% (26 patients, 0 events) vs. 64% (16 patients, 5 events), p=0.006, respectively. MRD assessment should be explored as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials and MRD risk-adapted trials may help optimize treatment in AL amyloidosis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

View details for DOI 10.1002/ajh.25746

View details for PubMedID 32010993