Routine Revascularization versus Initial Medical Therapy for Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Circulation Bangalore, S., Maron, D. J., Stone, G. W., Hochman, J. S. 2020


Background: Revascularization is often performed in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). However, whether revascularization reduces death and other cardiovascular outcomes is uncertain. Methods: We conducted PUBMED/EMBASE/CENTRAL searches for randomized trials comparing routine revascularization versus an initial conservative strategy in patients with SIHD. The primary outcome was death. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure, stroke, unstable angina and freedom from angina. Trials were stratified by percent stent use and by percent statin use to evaluate outcomes in contemporary trials. Results: Fourteen RCTs that enrolled 14,877 patients followed up for a weighted mean of 4.5 years with 64,678 patient years of follow-up fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Most trials enrolled patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function, low symptom burden and excluded patients with left main disease. Revascularization compared with medical therapy alone was not associated with a reduced risk of death (RR=0.99, 95% CI 0.90-1.09). Trial sequential analysis showed that the cumulative z-curve crossed the futility boundary indicating firm evidence for lack of a 10% or greater reduction in death. Revascularization was associated with a reduced non-procedural MI (RR=0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.85) but also with increased procedural MI (RR=2.48, 95% CI 1.86-3.31) with no difference in overall MI (RR=0.93, 95% CI 0.83-1.03). A significant reduction in unstable angina (RR=0.64, 95% CI 0.45-0.92) and increase in freedom from angina (RR=1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.15) was also observed with revascularization. There were no treatment-related differences in the risk of heart failure or stroke. Conclusions: In patients with SIHD, routine revascularization was not associated with improved survival, but was associated with a lower risk of non-procedural MI and unstable angina with greater freedom from angina at the expense of higher rates of procedural MI. Longer-term follow-up of trials is needed to assess whether reduction in these non-fatal spontaneous events improves long-term survival.

View details for DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048194

View details for PubMedID 32794407