Notice: Users may be experiencing issues with displaying some pages on stanfordhealthcare.org. We are working closely with our technical teams to resolve the issue as quickly as possible. Thank you for your patience.
 

Learn about the flu shot, COVID-19 vaccine, and our masking policy »

Stanford Health Care

Heterogeneity in managing rib fractures across non-trauma and level I, II, and III trauma centers. American journal of surgery Choi, J. n., Kaghazchi, A. n., Dickerson, K. L., Tennakoon, L. n., Spain, D. A., Forrester, J. D. 2021

Abstract

We aimed to elucidate management patterns and outcomes of high-risk patients with rib fractures (elderly or flail chest) across non-trauma and trauma centers. We hypothesized highest-capacity (level I) centers would have best outcomes for high-risk patients.We queried the 2016 National Emergency Department Sample to identify adults presenting with rib fractures. Multivariable regression assessed ED and inpatient events across non-trauma and level III/II/I trauma centers.Among 504,085 rib fracture encounters, 46% presented to non-trauma centers. Elderly patients with multiple rib fractures had stepwise increase in inpatient admission odds and stepwise decrease in pneumonia odds at higher-capacity trauma centers compared to non-trauma centers. Among patients with flail chest, odds of undergoing surgical stabilization (SSRF) increased at trauma centers. Undergoing SSRF was associated with reduced mortality but remained underutilized.Half of patients with rib fractures present to non-trauma centers. Nationwide care-optimization for high-risk patients requires further effort.

View details for DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.02.013

View details for PubMedID 33612257