Bacteria in Surgical Smoke: A Self-Controlled Lab Study Using Porcine Spinal Tissues. Spine Zhu, Z., Liu, N., Xia, W., Liu, H., Wood, K. B., Wang, K. 2021

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: A lab study performed in a self-controlled fashion.OBJECTIVE: To examine whether "surgical smoke" generated by using the electrocautery on porcine spinal tissues could contain viable bacteria.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The year 2020 has seen a surge in legislation regarding surgical smoke evacuation in the operating room across the United States. Surgical smoke contains numerous toxic and carcinogenic substances, which spine surgeons and operating room staff are regularly exposed to. While the smoke's chemical toxicity has been extensively studied, little is known about its biohazard level.METHODS: The electrocautery was used to "operate on" 20 segments of porcine spinal tissues on a clean bench. In each operation, the generated smoke was captured with a swab, which was positioned above the surgical site and within the smoke, to obtain bacteria cultures. Two other swabs -a tissue swab (swabbing the porcine tissue itself) and a blank swab (swabbing an empty sterile bowl)- were collected as controls. The culture results were compared among the three groups. An additional experiment was conducted to see whether using a mask can reduce the "infection rate" of the swab.RESULTS: While all blank swabs tested negative, 95% (19/20) of the smoke swabs tested positive, with a total of nine bacteria species identified. The most prevalent species observed in the smoke swabs included Serratia liquefaciens, Lactococcus garvieae, and Hafnia alvei, etc. Among the positive smoke swabs, 84% (16/19) had one or more bacteria species that were consistent with the cultures of their corresponding tissue swabs. Using a surgical or N95 mask reduced the "infection rate" of the swab.CONCLUSIONS: "Surgical smoke" generated by electrocauterization of porcine spinal tissues contains viable bacteria. Further research in actual spine surgery is needed next.Level of Evidence: N/A.

View details for DOI 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004079

View details for PubMedID 33907080