Abstract

PURPOSE: Cataract is a known effect of trabeculectomy (TE), but some surgeons are hesitant to perform combined phacoemulsification-TE (PTE) due to a risk of increased TE failure. Herein, we compare intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering between trabeculectomy (TE) and phacoemulsification-TE (PTE) and investigate factors that impact patient outcomes.METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of adults undergoing primary TE or PTE at our institution from 2010 to 2017. We used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to investigate time to TE failure, and Cox proportional hazards modeling to investigate predictors of TE failure, defined as undergoing a second glaucoma surgery or using more IOP-lowering medications than pre-operatively.RESULTS: 318 surgeries (218 TE; 100 PTE) from 268 patients were included. Median follow-up time was 753days. Mean baseline IOP was 21.1mmHg. There were no significant differences in IOP between TE and PTE groups beyond postoperative year 1, with 28.9-46.5% of TE and 35.5-44.4% of PTE groups achieving IOP =10. Final IOP was similar in both groups (p=0.22): 12.41 (SD 4.18) mmHg in the TE group and 14.05 (SD 5.45) in the PTE group. 84 (26.4%) surgeries met failure criteria. After adjusting for surgery type, sex, age, race, surgeon, and glaucoma diagnosis there were no significant differences in TE failure.CONCLUSION: This study suggests there is no significant difference in the risk of TE failure in patients receiving TE versus those receiving PTE.

View details for DOI 10.1080/02713683.2022.2045611

View details for PubMedID 35317681