Abstract

Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have proven effective in increasing time-in-range during both clinical trials and real-world use. Further improvements in outcomes for single hormone (insulin only) AID may be limited by suboptimal insulin delivery settings.Adults (=18 years of age) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) were randomized to either sensor-augmented pump (SAP) (inclusive of predictive low-glucose suspend) or adaptive zone model predictive control AID for 13 weeks, then crossed over to the other arm. Each week, the AID insulin delivery settings were sequentially and automatically updated by an adaptation system running on the study phone. Primary outcome was sensor glucose time-in-range 70-180 mg/dL, with non-inferiority in percent time below 54 mg/dL as a hierarchical outcome.Thirty-five participants completed the trial (mean age 39±16 years, HbA1c at enrollment 6.9±1.0%). Mean time-in-range 70-180 mg/dL was 66% with SAP versus 69% with AID (mean adjusted difference +2% [95% CI -1% to +6%], P=0.22). Median time <70 mg/dL improved from 3.0% with SAP to 1.6% with AID (-1.5% [-2.4%, -0.5%], P=0.002). The adaptation system decreased initial basal rates by a median of 4% (-8%, 16%,) and increased initial carbohydrate ratios by a median of 45% (32%, 59%) after 13 weeks.Automated adaptation of insulin delivery settings with AID use did not significantly improve time-in-range in this very well controlled population. Additional study and further refinement of the adaptation system is needed, especially in populations with differing degrees of baseline glycemic control, who may show larger benefits from adaptation.

View details for DOI 10.1089/dia.2022.0084

View details for PubMedID 35549708