A global, cross-sectional survey of patient-reported outcomes, disease burden, and quality of life in epidermolysis bullosa simplex. Orphanet journal of rare diseases So, J. Y., Fulchand, S., Wong, C. Y., Li, S., Nazaroff, J., Gorell, E. S., de Souza, M. P., Murrell, D. F., Teng, J. M., Chiou, A. S., Tang, J. Y. 2022; 17 (1): 270

Abstract

Epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS) comprises a group of rare, blistering genodermatoses. Prior work has been limited by small sample sizes, and much remains unexplored about the disease burden and health-related quality of life (QOL) of patients with EBS. The aim of this study was to characterize the most common patient-reported clinical manifestations and the health-related impact of QOL in EBS, and to examine differences in disease burden by age.Patients with a diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa (EB) or their caregivers completed a one-time online survey administered by EBCare, an international online EB registry. Survey data from respondents self-reporting a diagnosis of EBS were analyzed for clinical and wound manifestations, medication use, and QOL (using Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa [QOLEB] scores). Differences across age groups were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's exact tests.There were 214 survey respondents with EBS. The mean age was 32.8 years (standard deviation?=?19.2). Many respondents reported blisters (93%), recurrent wounds (89%), pain (74%), chronic wounds (59%), itch (55%), and difficulty walking (44%). Mean QOLEB score was 14.7 (standard deviation?=?7.5) indicating a "moderate" impact on QOL, and 12% of respondents required regular use of opiates. Findings were consistent in subgroup analyses restricted to respondents with diagnostic confirmation via genetic testing or skin biopsy (n?=?63 of 214). Age-stratified analyses revealed differences in disease burden: younger respondents were more likely to self-report severe disease (24% vs. 19% vs. 5% for respondents aged 0-9 vs. 10-17 vs. 18?+?, p?=?0.001), failure to thrive (9% vs. 15% vs. 3%, p?=?0.02), and use of gastrostomy tubes (15% vs. 12% vs. 1%, p?

View details for DOI 10.1186/s13023-022-02433-3

View details for PubMedID 35841105