Learn about the flu shot, COVID-19 vaccine, and our masking policy »
New to MyHealth?
Manage Your Care From Anywhere.
Access your health information from any device with MyHealth. You can message your clinic, view lab results, schedule an appointment, and pay your bill.
ALREADY HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
DON'T HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
NEED MORE DETAILS?
MyHealth for Mobile
Get the iPhone MyHealth app »
Get the Android MyHealth app »
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Right atrial (RA) imaging has emerged as a promising tool for the evaluation of patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), albeit without systematic validation.METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane library were searched for studies investigating the prognostic value of RA imaging assessment in patients with PH from 2000 to June 2021 (PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42020212850). An inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis of univariable hazard ratios (HRs) was performed using a random effects model.RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included (3,476 patients with PH; 74% female, 86% pulmonary arterial hypertension). Risk of bias was low/moderate (Quality of Prognosis Studies checklist). RA area (HR 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.08), RA indexed area (HR 1.09; 95% CI 1.04-1.14), RA peak longitudinal strain (PLS; HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.91-0.97) and RA total emptying fraction (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.94-0.98) were significantly associated with combined end-points including death, clinical worsening and/or lung transplantation; RA volume and volume index showed marginal significant associations. RA area (HR 1.06; 95% CI 1.04-1.07), RA indexed area (HR 1.12; 95% CI 1.07-1.17) and RA PLS (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-0.99) showed significant associations with mortality; RA total emptying fraction showed a marginal association.CONCLUSIONS: Imaging-based RA assessment qualifies as a relevant prognostic marker in PH. RA area reliably predicts composite end-points and mortality, which underscores its clinical utility. RA PLS emerged as a promising imaging measure, but is currently limited by the number of studies and different acquisition methods.
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.healun.2022.11.007
View details for PubMedID 36610927