Abstract

Autologous breast reconstruction yields improved long-term aesthetic results but requires increased resources of practitioners and hospital systems. Innovations in radiographic imaging have been used increasingly to improve the efficiency and success of free-flap harvest. Augmented reality (AR) affords the opportunity to superimpose relevant imaging on a surgeon's native field of view, potentially facilitating dissection of anatomically variable structures. To validate the spatial fidelity of AR projections of deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) relevant anatomy, comparisons of 3D models and their virtual renderings were performed by four independent observers. Measured discrepancies between the real and holographic models were evaluated.3D-printed models of DIEP relevant anatomy were fabricated from CTA data from 19 de-identified patients. The corresponding CTA data was similarly formatted for the Microsoft Hololens to generate corresponding projections. Anatomic points were initially measured on 3D models, after which, the corresponding points were measured on the Hololens projections from two separate vantages. Statistical analyses, including Generalized Linear Modeling, were performed to characterize spatial fidelity regarding translation, rotation, and scale of holographic projections.Amongst all participants, the median translational displacement at corresponding points was 9.0 mm, 12.1 mm, and 13.5 mm between the real 3D model and V1, 3D model and V2, and between V1 and V2, respectively.Corresponding points, including topography of perforating vessels for the purposes of breast reconstruction can be identified within millimeters, but there remain multiple independent contributors of error, most notably the participant and location at which the projection is perceived.

View details for DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010592

View details for PubMedID 37092985