Notice: Users may be experiencing issues with displaying some pages on stanfordhealthcare.org. We are working closely with our technical teams to resolve the issue as quickly as possible. Thank you for your patience.
 

See our updated masking policy »

Stanford Health Care

"We're always an afterthought"- Designing tobacco control campaigns for dissemination with and to LGBTQ?+-serving community organizations: a thematic analysis. Cancer causes & control : CCC Ramanadhan, S., Salvia, M., Hanby, E., Revette, A. C., Rivard, M. K., Scout, N. F., Applegate, J., Gordon, B., Machado, A., Lunn, M. R., Obedin-Maliver, J., Potter, J., Chen, J. T., Tan, A. S. 2023

Abstract

Evidence-based health communication campaigns can support tobacco control and address tobacco-related inequities among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ?+) populations. Community organizations focused on LGBTQ?+?health (e.g., nonprofits, community centers, and community health centers) can be prime channels for delivering evidence-based health communication campaigns. However, it is unclear how to balance the goals of a) designing campaigns to support broad adoption/uptake and b) adaptation addressing the needs of diverse communities and contexts. As part of an effort to support "designing for dissemination," we explored the key challenges and opportunities staff and leaders of LGBTQ?+?-serving community organizations encounter when adopting or adapting evidence-based health communication campaigns.A team of researchers and advisory committee members conducted this study, many of whom have lived, research, and/or practice experience with LGBTQ?+?health. We interviewed 22 staff members and leaders of community organizations serving LGBTQ?+?populations in the US in early 2021. We used a team-based, reflexive thematic analysis approach.The findings highlight the challenges of attempting to use health communication campaigns misaligned with the assets and needs of organizations and community members. The three major themes identified were as follows: (1) available evidence-based health communication campaigns typically do not sufficiently center LGBTQ?+?communities, (2) negotiation regarding campaign utilization places additional burden on practitioners who have to act as "gatekeepers," and (3) processes of using health communication campaigns often conflict with organizational efforts to engage community members in adoption and adaptation activities.We offer a set of considerations to support collaborative design and dissemination of health communication campaigns to organizations serving LGBTQ?+?communities: (1) develop campaigns with and for LGBTQ?+?populations, (2) attend to the broader structural forces impacting campaign recipients, (3) support in-house testing and adaptations, and (4) increase access to granular data for community organizations.

View details for DOI 10.1007/s10552-023-01706-x

View details for PubMedID 37160611

View details for PubMedCentralID 8885914