Skip to main content
ACR Appropriateness Criteria Workup of Noncerebral Systemic Arterial Embolic Source. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR Expert Panels on Vascular Imaging and Cardiac Imaging, Parenti, V. G., Vijay, K., Maroules, C. D., Majdalany, B. S., Koweek, L. M., Khaja, M. S., Ghoshhajra, B. B., Agarwal, P. P., Contrella, B. N., Keefe, N. A., Lo, B. M., Malik, S. B., Surasi, D. S., Waite, K., Williamson, E. E., Abbara, S., Dill, K. E. 2023; 20 (5S): S285-S300

Abstract

Noncerebral systemic arterial embolism, which can originate from cardiac and noncardiac sources, is an important cause of patient morbidity and mortality. When an embolic source dislodges, the resulting embolus can occlude a variety of peripheral and visceral arteries causing ischemia. Characteristic locations for noncerebral arterial occlusion include the upper extremities, abdominal viscera, and lower extremities. Ischemia in these regions can progress to tissue infarction resulting in limb amputation, bowel resection, or nephrectomy. Determining the source of arterial embolism is essential in order to direct treatment decisions. This document reviews the appropriateness category of various imaging procedures available to determine the source of the arterial embolism. The variants included in this document are known arterial occlusion in the upper extremity, lower extremity, mesentery, kidneys, and multiorgan distribution that are suspected to be of embolic etiology. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.02.005

View details for PubMedID 37236749