Abstract

To evaluate efficacy and safety of prophylactic multivessel vessel embolization (MVE) compared to internal iliac artery occlusion balloon (IIABO) placement for patients undergoing cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).An IRB approved retrospective series was performed of consecutive patients with PAS at a single institution between 2010-2021. MVE was performed in a hybrid operating room after cesarean section prior to hysterectomy. IIABO was performed with balloons placed into the bilateral internal iliac arteries which were inflated during hysterectomy. Median blood loss, transfusion requirements, percentage of cases requiring a transfusion, and adverse events were recorded.A total of 20 patients treated with embolization and 34 patients with balloons were included. Placenta percreta and previa were seen in 60% and 90% of patients, respectively. Median blood loss was 713 mL (interquartile range, 475 - 1000) with MVE compared to 2000 mL (1500- 2425) in the IIABO group (P < .0001). The median total number of units of packed red blood cell transfusions (0 vs 2.5) and the percentage of cases requiring a transfusion (20 vs 65%) were less in the MVE group (P < 0.01). A median of 4 vessels (3-9) were embolized during MVE. No major complications or non-target embolization consequences were observed.Prophylactic multi vessel embolization is a safe procedure which reduces operative blood loss and transfusion requirements compared to IIABO in patients undergoing cesarean hysterectomy for presumed higher degree PAS.

View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.07.024

View details for PubMedID 37527770