Abstract

The timely diagnosis of primary bone malignancies in pediatric patients is critical to clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to investigate the initial presentation of pediatric bone sarcoma patients to an academic health care system and assess the current interval to diagnosis.We conducted a retrospective review of pediatric patients (aged 1-18) with biopsy-proven diagnosis of osteosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma presenting between 2004 and 2020. All living patients had 1 year or more of follow-up. Primary outcomes were interval to diagnosis, clinical features on initial presentation, percent of patients with negative radiographic workup at initial presentation, and number of health care encounters before diagnosis.Seventy-one patients (osteosarcoma, 51; Ewing sarcoma, 20) were included. Average age at presentation was 13.1 ± 3.3 years (range, 4.4-18.3). Average symptom duration was 5.4 ± 13.9 months (range, 0.1-84). Clinical features at initial presentation included limb/back pain (91.5% of patients), activity modification/pain medication use (78.9%), palpable mass (40.8%), night pain (35.2%), limp (25.4%), limb disuse (18.3%), and recent fever history (2.8%). Fourteen of 71 patients (19.7%) had negative radiographs at initial presentation. Average number of health care encounters before diagnosis was 1.9 ± 0.6 (range, 1.0-4.0), with most in the outpatient pediatrician clinics (81.2%) and emergency department (18.3%). Average time to diagnosis from initial presentation was 19.5 ± 65 days (range, 0-493); the 14 patients with initial negative radiographs had a statistically significant prolonged interval to diagnosis of 54 ± 134 days (range, 0-493; P = 0.018).We found pediatric patients with primary bone sarcoma present with an average interval to diagnosis of 20 days. Twenty percent of patients had a significantly prolonged interval to diagnosis of 54 days. Clinical features suggest night pain is not a sensitive indicator. In patients of appropriate age with persistent unilateral pain in suspicious locations, early advanced imaging with magnetic resonance imaging should be considered.

View details for DOI 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003031

View details for PubMedID 37567167