New to MyHealth?
Manage Your Care From Anywhere.
Access your health information from any device with MyHealth. You can message your clinic, view lab results, schedule an appointment, and pay your bill.
ALREADY HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
DON'T HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
NEED MORE DETAILS?
MyHealth for Mobile
Low Prognostic Nutritional Index is Common and Associated with Poor Outcomes Following Curative-intent Resection for Gastro-entero-pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Low Prognostic Nutritional Index is Common and Associated with Poor Outcomes Following Curative-intent Resection for Gastro-entero-pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY Xiang, J., Qian, Y., He, J., Lopez-Aguiar, A. G., Poultsides, G., Rocha, F., Weber, S., Fields, R., Idrees, K., Cho, C., Maithel, S. K., Lv, Y., Zhang, X., Pawlik, T. M. 2023Abstract
To investigate the impact of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) on short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent curative-intent resection for gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).Patients with GET-NETs who underwent curative-intent resection were identified from a multi-center database. The prognostic impact of clinicopathological factors including PNI on post-operative outcomes were evaluated. A novel nomogram was developed and externally validated.A total of 2,099 patients with GEP-NETs were included in the training cohort; 255 patients were in the external validation cohort. Median PNI (n=973) was 47.4 (IQR 43.1-52.4). At the time of presentation, 1,299 (61.9%) patients presented with some type of clinical symptom. Low-PNI (= 42.2) was associated with gastrointestinal symptoms, as well as nodal metastasis and distant metastasis (all p<0.05). Patients with a low PNI had a higher incidence of severe (= Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa: low PNI 24.9% vs. high PNI 15.4%, p=0.001) and multiple (= 3 types of complications: low PNI 14.5% vs. high PNI 9.2%, p=0.024) complications, as well as a worse overall survival (OS)(5-year OS, low PNI 73.7% vs. high PNI 88.5%, p<0.001), and RFS (5-year RFS, low PNI 68.5% vs. high PNI 79.8%, p=0.008) versus patients with high PNI (>42.2). A nomogram based on PNI, tumor grade and metastatic disease demonstrated excellent discrimination and calibration to predict OS in both the training (C-index 0.748) and two external validation (C-index 0.827, 0.745) cohorts.Low PNI was common and associated with worse short- and long-term outcomes among patients with GEP-NETs.
View details for DOI 10.1159/000534075
View details for Web of Science ID 001067770600001
View details for PubMedID 37703840