Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): Ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) irradiation has been reported to provide decreased normal tissue toxicity without compromising tumor control compared with conventional (CONV) irradiation. However, a comprehensive understanding of the FLASH biological effect requires precise quantification of radiobiology. The study is to explore whether deep learning (DL) can tackle the task. As a proof of concept, we investigate a DL model for estimating FLASH dose to its equivalent CONV dose.MATERIALS/METHODS: Healthy C57Bl/6 female mice underwent FLASH (200Gy/s; n?=?43) or CONV (0.12Gy/s; n?=?41) whole abdominal irradiation using 16 MeV electron beams with a dose escalation scheme of 5 groups (n?=?8 or 9) at 1Gy increments: 12-16Gy FLASH, 11-15Gy CONV. 4 days post-irradiation, 9 jejunum cross-sections per mouse were H&E stained for histological analysis. Each cross-section image was processed to remove lumen background and oversampled into multiple large-scale and small-scale patches along jejunal circumference. In CONV dataset, we randomly selected the data of 32 mice (80%) for model training and the rest (20%) for model validation. A ResNet101-based DL model, pre-trained with an unsupervised contrastive learning scheme, was retrained with only CONV training set to estimate corresponding CONV dose. For comparison, a crypt counting (CC) approach was implemented by manually counting the number of regenerating crypts on each cross-section image. An exponential function of dose vs crypt number was fitted with the CONV training set and used for dose estimation on the testing set. Mean squared error (MSE) was used to assess the accuracy of DL and CC approaches in estimating dose levels in CONV irradiation. The validated DL model was applied to the FLASH set to project FLASH dose into corresponding CONV dose that results in equivalent biological response.RESULTS: The CONV dose estimated by DL and CC approaches and DL-estimated FLASH equivalent dose were summarized in Table 1. The DL model achieved an MSE of 0.21 Gy2 on CONV testing set compared with 0.32 Gy2 of the CC approach. FLASH equivalent dose estimated by DL model for 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16Gy were 12.16±0.40, 12.53±0.32, 12.72±0.24, 12.85±0.20 and 13.04±0.27 Sv, respectively.CONCLUSION: Our proposed DL model can accurately estimate the CONV dose based on histological images. The DL predictions of FLASH dataset demonstrate that FLASH may reduce normal tissue toxicity with a lower equivalent dose, especially at high irradiated dose levels. Our study indicates that deep learning can be potentially used to assess the equivalent dose of FLASH irradiation to normal tissue.

View details for DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1241

View details for PubMedID 37785029