Decreasing false-positive detection of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) using RAPID ICH 3. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association Sreekrishnan, A., Giurgiutiu, D., Kitamura, F., Martinelli, C., Abdala, N., Haerian, H., Dehkharghani, S., Kwok, K., Yedavalli, V., Heit, J. J. 2023; 32 (12): 107396

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The prompt detection of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) on a non-contrast head CT (NCCT) is critical for the appropriate triage of patients, particularly in high volume/high acuity settings. Several automated ICH detection tools have been introduced; however, at present, most suffer from suboptimal specificity leading to false-positive notifications.METHODS: NCCT scans from 4 large databases were evaluated for the presence of an ICH (IPH, IVH, SAH or SDH) of >0.4 ml using fully-automated RAPID ICH 3.0 as compared to consensus detection from at least two neuroradiology experts. Scans were excluded for (1) severe CT artifacts, (2) prior neurosurgical procedures, or (3) recent intravenous contrast. ICH detection accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratios by were determined.RESULTS: A total of 881 studies were included. The automated software correctly identified 453/463 ICH-positive cases and 416/418 ICH-negative cases, resulting in a sensitivity of 97.84% and specificity 99.52%, positive predictive value 99.56%, and negative predictive value 97.65% for ICH detection. The positive and negative likelihood ratios for ICH detection were similarly favorable at 204.49 and 0.02 respectively. Mean processing time was <40 seconds.CONCLUSIONS: In this large data set of nearly 900 patients, the automated software demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for ICH detection, with rare false-positives.

View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107396

View details for PubMedID 37883825