Abstract

Clear criteria to individualize glycemic targets in patients with type II diabetes are lacking. In this post-hoc analysis of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes trial (ACCORD), we evaluate whether the kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) can identify patients for whom intensive glycemic control confers more benefit in preventing kidney microvascular outcomes.We divided the ACCORD trial population into quartiles based on 5-year kidney failure risk using the KFRE. We estimated conditional treatment effects within each quartile and compared them to the average treatment effect in the trial. The treatment effects of interest were the 7-year restricted-mean-survival-time (RMST) differences between intensive and standard glycemic control arms on (1) time-to-first development of severely elevated albuminuria or kidney failure and (2) all-cause mortality.We found evidence that the effect of intensive glycemic control on kidney microvascular outcomes and all-cause mortality varies with baseline risk of kidney failure. Patients with elevated baseline risk of kidney failure derived the most from intensive glycemic control in reducing kidney microvascular outcomes (7-year RMST difference of 114.8 (95% CI 58.1, 176.4)v. 48.4 (25.3, 69.6) days in the entire trial population) However, this same patient group also experienced a shorter time to death (7-year RMST difference of -56.7 (-100.2, -17.5) v. -23.6 (-42.2, -6.6)days).We found evidence of heterogenous treatment effects of intensive glycemic control on kidney microvascular outcomes in ACCORD as a function of predicted baseline risk of kidney failure. Patients with higher kidney failure risk experienced the most pronounced reduction in kidney microvascular outcomes but also experienced the highest risk of all-cause mortality.

View details for DOI 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000272

View details for PubMedID 38073026