Abstract

Frameless neuronavigation allows neurosurgeons to visualize and relate the position of surgical instruments to intracranial pathologies based on preoperative tomographic imaging. However, neuronavigation can often be inaccurate. Multiple factors have been proposed as potential causes, and new technologies are needed to overcome these challenges.To evaluate the accuracy of neuronavigation systems compared to near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging using Second Window Indocyanine Green, a novel technique, and to determine factors that lead to neuronavigation errors.A retrospective analysis was conducted on 56 patients who underwent primary resections of intracranial tumors. Patients received 5 mg/kg ICG approximately 24 h preoperatively. Intraoperatively, neuronavigation was used to plan craniotomies to place the tumors in the center. After craniotomy, NIR imaging visualized tumor-specific NIR signals. The accuracy of neuronavigation and NIR fluorescence imaging for delineating the tumor boundary prior to durotomy was compared.The neuronavigation centers and NIR centers were 23.0?±?7.7 % and 2.6?±?1.1 % deviated from the tumor centers, respectively, relative to the craniotomy sizes. In 12 cases, significant changes were made to the planned durotomy based on NIR imaging. Patient position was a significant predictor of neuronavigation inaccuracy on both univariate and multivariate analysis, with the prone position having significantly higher inaccuracy (29.2?±?8.1 %) compared to the supine (16.2?±?8.1 %, p value?

View details for DOI 10.1007/s11307-020-01495-8

View details for PubMedID 32232627

View details for PubMedCentralID 3563325