Skip to main content
 
Notice: Users may be experiencing issues with displaying some pages on stanfordhealthcare.org. We are working closely with our technical teams to resolve the issue as quickly as possible. Thank you for your patience.
Stanford Health Care

MRI Safety of Stapes Prostheses: A Systematic Review.

MRI Safety of Stapes Prostheses: A Systematic Review. Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology Daher, G. S., Kocharyan, A., Carlson, M. L., Dillon, W. P., Fischbein, N. J., Jackler, R., Rassner, U., Gurgel, R. K. 2024

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety of stapes prostheses.DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched from inception to November 2021 following PRISMA guidelines.REVIEW METHODS: Studies reporting evidence of stapes prosthesis displacement or interaction in adult or pediatric implant recipients undergoing MRI. Cadaveric, animal, and basic studies with nonhuman data were also included.RESULTS: From an initial search of 123 articles, 42 full-text studies were evaluated for eligibility and 19 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included. Motion artifact was reported in a few stainless steel prosthesis types in vitro; however, such displacement was not observed in human cadaver temporal bone studies and had no adverse reported outcomes. A small subgroup of patients in the 1980s received a ferromagnetic stainless steel stapes implant that was recalled and has not been used since 1987. Patients with implants performed in the 1980s should be directed to 1.5T scanners from an abundance of caution.CONCLUSION: Modern (post-1987) stapes prostheses do not pose a risk in vivo when exposed to the magnetic fields of MRI scanners.

View details for DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004170

View details for PubMedID 38518765