New to MyHealth?
Manage Your Care From Anywhere.
Access your health information from any device with MyHealth. You can message your clinic, view lab results, schedule an appointment, and pay your bill.
ALREADY HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
DON'T HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
NEED MORE DETAILS?
MyHealth for Mobile
Get the iPhone MyHealth app »
Get the Android MyHealth app »
Abstract
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cryoablation of musculoskeletal metastases in terms of achieving pain palliation and local tumor control.A retrospective review was performed of 92 musculoskeletal metastases in 56 patients treated with percutaneous image-guided cryoablation. Mean age of the cohort was 53.9 y ± 15.1, and cohort included 48% (27/56) men. Median tumor volume was 13.0 cm3 (range, 0.5-577.2 cm3). Indications for treatment included pain palliation (41%; 38/92), local tumor control (15%; 14/92), or both (43%; 40/92). Concurrent cementoplasty was performed after 28% (26/92) of treatments.In 78 tumors treated for pain palliation, median pain score before treatment was 8.0. Decreased median pain scores were reported 1 day (6.0; P < .001, n = 62), 1 week (5.0; P < .001, n = 70), 1 month (5.0; P < .001, n = 63), and 3 months (4.5; P = .01, n = 28) after treatment. The median pain score at 6-month follow-up was 7.5 (P = .33, n = 11). Radiographic local tumor control rates were 90% (37/41) at 3 months, 86% (32/37) at 6 months, and 79% (26/33) at 12 months after treatment. The procedural complication rate was 4.3% (4/92). The 3 major complications included 2 cases of hemothorax and 1 transient foot drop.Cryoablation is an effective treatment for palliating painful musculoskeletal metastases and achieving local tumor control.
View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.07.026
View details for PubMedID 27745968